Correlation Analysis

Assignment: (The topic of discussion is Logistic Regression)

Examine the results of Exercise 2 at the end of the chapter. (exercise 2 data attached).

Set up the 9-step hypothesis testing procedure for the analysis.

This is the format for the 9-step hypothesis I need to use:

Exercise 2

9-step Hypothesis Testing Procedure:

1. Evaluate the Data

2. Review Assumptions

3. State Hypotheses

4. Select the Test Statistic

5. Distribution of the Test Statistic

6. State the Decision Rule

7. Calculate the Test Statistic

8. Statistical Decision

9. Conclusion

Exercise 2:

Recode the depressed state of mind variable into a dichotomous variable with two groups: those who rated themselves as rarely depressed are scored 0, and those who rated themselves as sometimes to routinely depressed are scored 1. Using the new variable as the outcome measure, determine which of the following variables increase the odds of being depressed:

Smoking history: recoded into currently smoking = 1, and not currently smoking = 0.

2. Gender: Male = 0, Female = 1

3. Quality of life in the past month: recoded so that values 1 to 3 (sometimes to very unhappy) become 0, and 4 to 6 (sometimes to extremely happy) become 1.

4. Total score on the Inventory of Positive Psychological Attitudes scale (IPPA): Enter recoded smoking history and gender in the first block and recoded quality of life and total IPPA score in the second block.

Results for Exercise 2:

A logistic regression was run to answer the research question (n=653). The results are contained in Exercise Figure 13-1. The variables were entered in tow blocks. Smoking status and gender were entered in block 1, which was significant (p=.003), and accounted for 1.8 to 2.4 percent of the variance. The Hosmer and Lemeshow Test indicated a good fit (p=.808). Only smoking made a significant contribution (p=.001). Quality of life and total IPPA score were entered in block 2, which was significant (p=.000). The total model was significant (p=.000), and accounted for 34.3 to 45.7 percent of the variance. The model was a good fit. (Hosmer and Lemeshow, chi square = 4.068, df = 8, p = .851). The sensitivity of the model in predicting depression was 72.3 percent. The specificity in predicting those who were not depressed was 80. Three of the variables, smoking status (p=.032), quality of life (p=.000), and Total IPPA Score (p=.000) were significant predictors. The odds of being depressed were 2 times higher for those who smoked. Higher quality of life was related to lower probability of depression. The IPPA scale is scored from 30 to 210, therefore, a 1 point increase in that score would be of no practical interest. To calculate the effect of a 30 point change in IPPA, multiply the b-weight for TOTAL times 30 and raise 2.1718 to that power (.057 x 30 = 1.71), raising 2.1718 to the power of 1.71 = 5.53. So, for every 30 point increase in the IPPA score, the odds of being depressed go down (negative b-weight) 5.5 times.

Exercise Figure 13-1

LOGISTIC REGRESSION

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value

Internal Value

Rarely
0

Sometimes to routinely

1

BLOCK 1: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi Square

df

Sig

Step 1 Step

11.848

2

.003

Block

11.848

2

.003

Model

11.848

2

.003

Model Summary

Step

-2Log likelihood

Cox &

Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1

892.445

.018

.024

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step

Chi Square

Df

Sig.

1
.059
1
.808

Variables in the Equation

B

S.E.

Wald

df

Sig

Exp(B)

Step 1(a) SMOKEREC

.903
.273
10.978

1

.001
2.468
Gender
.169
.166
1.037

1

.309
1.184
Constant
-.275
.137
4.039

1

.044
.759

a Variables entered on step1: SMOKERERC, GENDER

Block 2: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi Square

df

Sig.

Step 1 Step
262.275
2
.000
Block
262.275
2
.000
Model
274.123
4
.000

Model Summary

Step

-2 Log likelihood

Cox &

Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1

630.170

.343

.457

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step

Chi Square

df

Sig.

1
4.068
8
.851

Classification Table (a)

Observed

Predicted

Depression recoded

rarely Sometimes to

routinely

Percentage correct

Step 1 Depression Rarely

recoded

Sometimes

to routinely

273

87

66

227

80.5

72.3

Overall percentage

76.6

a The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B

S.E.

Wald

df

Sig

Exp(B)

Step 1(a) SMOKEREC

.771

.359

4.621

1

.032

2.162

GENDER

.225

.206

1.187

1

.276

1.252

QOLREC

-1.066

.292

13.320

1

.000

.344

TOTAL

-.057

.005

117.961

1

.000

.944

Constant

9.433

.832

128.681

1

.000

12499.450

a Variable(s) entered on step 1: QOLREC, TOTAL

To see this answer, please subscribe.